|
Technical Quality
(10%)
An evaluation of the performance and
efficiency of the technical components used in the Web project. |
|
Category |
Excellent |
Satisfactory |
Needs Improvement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Navigational Structure |
The
navigational structure is organized and designed such that users move
intuitively through the Web project. |
The
navigational structure is somewhat unsystematic causing hesitation and
back-tracking for users as they attempt to maneuver through the Web project. |
The
navigational structure is confusing to the extent that users experience
difficulty maneuvering through the Web project.
-OR-
Navigational tools may be missing from the Web pages. |
|
Navigational Functionality |
The Web
Project appears to be free of broken links. |
The Web
Project has minimal broken links..
|
The Web
Project has a multitude of broken links which hinders its functionality.
|
|
Browser Usage
|
The Web project
functions efficiently in a multi-browser environment (i.e. Internet
Explorer, Netscape) |
Some components of the
Web project do not function in a multi-browser environment (i.e. Internet
Explorer, Netscape) |
The Web Project does
not function properly in a multi-browser environment. |
|
Optimization |
Each page of the Web
project is optimally designed to load in a timely and efficient manner. |
Some pages of the Web
project do not load in a timely and efficient manner. |
Little consideration was given to the download speed when designing the Web
content.. |
|
Total pts. (12) |
|
|
|
|

Innovative Web
Design (30%)
An evaluation of active participation
and original graphic design of the Web project. |
|
Category |
Excellent |
Satisfactory |
Needs Improvement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Design Elements (Page
backgrounds (colors and images), horizontal lines, tables) |
The Web project is
aesthetically pleasing, well organized, and easy to read. The proper use of
design elements is evident. |
The Web project is
aesthetically pleasing. Most of the text is easy to read. The design
elements are suitable and appropriate. |
Text is difficult to read.
-OR-
Few design elements are used to organize content.
-OR –
Design elements
are distracting or inappropriate. |
|
Originality of Graphics
(Drawings, illustrations, digital pictures) |
The
Web project contains student-produced graphics and illustrations that
consistently enhance the project’s purpose. |
The
Web project contains several student-produced graphics and illustrations
that enhance the project’s purpose. |
The
Web project contains minimal or no student-produced graphics or
illustrations. |
|
Interactivity
(Discussion forums,
message boards, guestbooks, e-mail, puzzles, and games)
|
The Web
project offers many opportunities for interactivity with viewers. Many
new opportunities for communication and collaboration are present. |
The Web
project offers several opportunities for viewer interactivity through
communication and
collaboration. |
The Web
project offers minimal or no opportunities for viewer interactivity through
communication and
collaboration. |
|
Effectiveness of Delivery
|
The Web project’s design
supports and enhances the delivery of the educational content by having a
consistent look and feel. |
The Web project’s design
supports the delivery of the educational content by having a somewhat
consistent look and feel |
The Web project’s design
does not enhance the delivery of content. The project is not consistent in
look and feel. |
|
Creativity and Style |
The
Web project is characterized by innovation and originality of style that
effectively harnesses Web resources for optimum teaching and learning. |
The Web project is
efficient and effective in conventional uses of Web resources for teaching
and learning.
|
The Web project lacks
imagination and creative uses of Web resources for teaching and learning.
|
|
Total pts. (15) |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|